another server
I'm working on a server as well...right now, I'm leaning toward getting rid of the Nexus and PoK at the very least, gah how I despise those zones, I want it to be somewhat classic, but with a lot of custom content...I want to re-experience the magic and make EQ my own.
Umm, I know this isn't the place for it, but since I mentioned my server and all, any chance there's any way to change how auto-attack works? I'm assuming it's hardcoded, but if it's not, I'd like to make it more interactive....pressing Q....or in my case A is just...well....boring. Not expecting to be able to do it, just very hopeful, lol. |
circle of elements is a full old world remake, including old world game mechanics, with custom content and quests and npcs text as well. so you shoudl help us :)
Quote:
i think theres tons of people like me, who dont give a sh* about eq emu, or even the eqlive, but would still play a pre-kunark server, but maybe not =/ i think wiz should have a poll on his server about weather he should continue wr or a eq remake lol |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"We still haven't had a REAL milennia shift for four years, so I suggest we set back all calendars to 1999 again." Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Because." and "Because you suck." You've provided nothing but personal bias and personal attacks on my own project throughout the entirety of this post. Your hint that I'm doing this to try to be a cool forum dood is pretty pathetic too. Let me just explain this as simple as possible. When you're trying to convince a person of an opposite stance, you need to provide plenty of reasoning - see my original post, and the amount of people who said it changed their views. If I had written as you, it would have been something like this: "EQclassic doesn't work beacuse WR ROCKS man and you know it you know you want to play WR hahaha you're a freak and you KNOW that EQclassic sucks you KNOW it." How many people would be convinced, do you think? You get an F- on your test. And I'm still amazed at the stupidity of that analogy. |
Quote:
If I made a poll like that, I'd probably get some people who'd want me to make an EQ classic remake (by sheer virtue of time investment already placed into WR alone most people wouldn't want it to change though), but 95% of these people would quit within a few weeks on a real EQ classic server. I know you're stonewalling what everyone else is saying, but jeesh, at least misunderstand me in the right way. |
Quote:
1. pre -kunark wont be fun now because were not noobs and wont be getting lost in neriak.. 2. there wont be enuf content on a pre-kunark server whats my point is: 1. pre-kunark wasnt leet becasue we were noobs. ive been on subject this whole time, it seems like your the one who keeps posting without a point, your not even talking about eq classic your just pwning me with your brain and giving me a scool lesson Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
then wtf am i posting here still Quote:
Quote:
and then you quote the very last part, and make it sound llike i said a classic server is the best in the world. then you give me a lesson on how to back up my point . way to be a dick man. |
Quote:
Are you even trying anymore? |
screw u lol, hell no im not trying, not trying to be leet anyway, all im trying to do is make peope think eq classic server isnt a bad idea..
this thread should be locked lol.. i mean.. what if made a thread called 'Winters Roar - and why it doesnt work" of course the thread would be stupid, becasue theres no reason wr cant work, it just has very limited appeal (who would want to play norrath jr. besides people banned from eq or broke peopel with no other choice?) |
Quote:
I'll settle with solid logic and proven points. Or as you call it, "being leet". :D |
Quote:
what blind belief do i believe in???//?//? |
Quote:
That's all. |
Quote:
You have stated that pre-kunark content was amazing and awesome and delicious, without actually explaining what was so good about it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Unless you missed it, cleverboy, YOU were the one that quoted the section I picked apart. I was replying to your claim that it was a logical point. Way to insult yourself. You didn't say "unless", you said "because". There's a huge difference there. You seem to be getting rather riled up. |
This thread is the reason the EQEmu forums have existed to this point.
Once it dies down, you can close them. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You quoted as logic: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You then said: Quote:
|
what? lol
someone put this in dumbass terms for me |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.