EQEmulator Forums

EQEmulator Forums (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/index.php)
-   Development::Database/World Building (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=596)
-   -   Poll who uses which MySQl? (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/showthread.php?t=22395)

Angelox 02-06-2007 10:20 AM

Poll who uses which MySQl?
 
Would like to see how much MySql5 is in use already. or who still uses 4

cavedude 02-06-2007 01:45 PM

You should have an I use all 3 options for weirdos like me ;)

Angelox 02-06-2007 02:36 PM

Looks like MySql5 is loosing ground! Darn, I gambled a lot of money there ...

Angelox 02-06-2007 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cavedude
You should have an I use all 3 options for weirdos like me ;)

I've had all three and just had 4.0 and 5.0 tell the other day.

cavedude 02-06-2007 02:53 PM

Replied for PEQ. As for myself, I have a 4.1 server and a 5.0. Personally, I actually like the 4.1 better. Seems to outperform 5.0 on my servers.

John Adams 02-07-2007 02:30 AM

So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.

cavedude 02-07-2007 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.

I agree 100%

cavedude 02-07-2007 04:44 AM

Let me just clarify.

I do agree MySQL 5.0 would be best to migrate to. Not so much for the features but for the fact that it is an active project and not obsolete. EQEmu needs to move forward.

However, I have to admit MySQL 4.1 is faster and uses less resources than 5.0. I won't hide that fact and tell everybody 5.0 is better in every way when it isn't.

As for 4.0, well it lacks the features of the above and also is slower than both. I voted for it because that is what PEQ runs, atm. It's obsolete unsupported software. HOWEVER, I do not want it to be forgotten at first. If a migration to 5.0 takes place, I do not want EQEmu to change to prevent use of 4.0 or 4.1. It should be backwards compatible, for at least the first year or so. Likewise, when 5.1 and 5.2 and so forth are out, I do not want 5.0 forgotten about. People deserve a choice.

Angelox 02-07-2007 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.

Lol - that's ok , just so long as you voted for 5.0, and made the bar fatter too :)

gernblan 02-12-2007 02:15 AM

Believe it or not, I've had the best results (under linux anyway) with mysql 5.x vs. 4.x

I know you target 4.x still, but 5.x is just a better overall experience for me. Less problems across the board.

Angelox 02-14-2007 05:59 AM

I made this thread sticky, and gave it a mild "bump" see if we can't get in some more votes :)

Kayot 02-14-2007 09:36 AM

When I started mySQL it was a 4.1. I needed it because PHPbb2 wouldn't accept any thing newer. Then a few months later they did. MySQL 5 is for me the most.

In 4.1 the Admin tool would load tables faster and didn't have an extra table on install. However the quary tool runs faster on 5 when building results.

MySQL 5 - The Way it's mean to be stored!

cavedude 02-14-2007 10:02 AM

MS Access ftw.

Kayot 02-14-2007 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cavedude
MS Access ftw.

I don't know if I should laugh or hate you...

ArChron 02-19-2007 05:40 AM

A little late to the party, but MySQL 5... hang on... 5.0.27.

Gotta have them views...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.