Quote:
|
Originally Posted by javaman
I am not trying to offend but offer the perspective of someone just coming in.
These things might have been easy to get on google a while back, but that seems to be diminishing.
|
Thats unfortunate, but out of our hands.
Quote:
|
WOW does not seem so suffer these issues. Blizzard doesn't seem to be putting a good stop to anything there. I have found around 10 different repacks of wowemu (7 of which I actually got to work -> I should probably post a guide).
|
Ok.. I'm not sure if I see your point.
Quote:
As far as development of this goes, I am personally used to VS6. I would guess I could get source of sf build and observe TCP packets, but I must assume is is more complicated than that. Maybe some sort of PKI going on is causing the bottleneck
Or is it the lack of interest, or the need of a new dev that just purchased titanium to do this.
|
How is it the lack of interest? The project is not dead, and yet you speak of it as it is.
Quote:
|
On another note, and I am not quite sure of the legality of this. Does anyone in here have experience with WinPAR? I would assume the answer to be yes. It would seem that someone with working 0.6.2 could build a PAR set on their Everquest directory (in case a file ever get corrupted, they could recover it with the par set) and since this par set is not the files, but just a measure against corruption could use this par set to repair a titanium install (I can't see the files being that drastically different, unless they are using some sort of real-time mutation encryption exceution). Thoughts?
|
I haven't heard of this and am lazy to look it up -- but I'm going to take a guess and say that if you're suggesting to distribute any EQ Client data in part or in whole -- we cannot. It's the final verdict.