[Darkonig]

Tradeskills.cpp

//returns true on success
<!bool Client::TradeskillExecute(DBTradeskillRecipe_Struct *spec, SkillType tradeskill) {
>!bool Client::TradeskillExecute(DBTradeskillRecipe_Struct *spec) {
<!	if(spec == NULL || tradeskill == 0)
!>	if(spec == NULL)
		return(false);
	
<!	int16 user_skill = GetSkill(tradeskill);
!>	int16 user_skill = GetSkill(spec->tradeskill);
	float chance = 0;
	float skillup_modifier;
	sint16 thirdstat = 0;
	sint16 stat_modifier = 15;
	uint16 success_modifier;

	// Rework based on the info on eqtraders.com
	// http://mboards.eqtraders.com/eq/showthread.php?t=22246
	// 09/10/2006 v0.1 (eq4me)
	// 09/11/2006 v0.2 (eq4me)
	// Todo:
	//     Implementing AAs
	//     Success modifiers based on recipes
	//     Skillup modifiers based on the rarity of the ingredients

	// Some tradeskills are more eqal then others. ;-)
	// If you want to customize the stage1 success rate do it here.
    // Remember: skillup_modifier is (float). Lower is better
<!	switch(tradeskill) {
!>	switch(spec->tradeskill) {
	case FLETCHING:
	case ALCHEMY:
	case JEWELRY_MAKING:
	case POTTERY:
		skillup_modifier = 4;
		break;
	case BAKING:
	case BREWING:
		skillup_modifier = 3;
		break;
	case RESEARCH:
		skillup_modifier = 1;
		break;
	default:
		skillup_modifier = 2;
		break;
	}

	// Some tradeskills take the higher of one additional stat beside INT and WIS
	// to determine the skillup rate. Additionally these tradeskills do not have an
	// -15 modifier on their statbonus.
<!	if (tradeskill ==  FLETCHING || tradeskill == MAKE_POISON) {
!>	switch(spec->tradeskill) {
!>	case FLETCHING:
!>	case MAKE_POISON:
		thirdstat = GetDEX();
		stat_modifier = 0;
		break;
<!	} else if (tradeskill == BLACKSMITHING) {
!>	case BLACKSMITHING:
		thirdstat = GetSTR();
		stat_modifier = 0;
!>		break;
!>	default:
!>		break;
	}
	
	sint16 higher_from_int_wis = (GetINT() > GetWIS()) ? GetINT() : GetWIS();
	sint16 bonusstat = (higher_from_int_wis > thirdstat) ? higher_from_int_wis : thirdstat;
	
	vector< pair<uint32,uint8> >::iterator itr;


    //calculate the base success chance
	// For trivials over 68 the chance is (skill - 0.75*trivial) +51.5
    // For trivial up to 68 the chance is (skill - trivial) + 66
	if (spec->trivial >= 68) {
		chance = (user_skill - (0.75*spec->trivial)) + 51.5;
	} else {
		chance = (user_skill - spec->trivial) + 66;
	}
	
	sint16 over_trivial = (sint16)user_skill - (sint16)spec->trivial;

	//handle caps
	if(spec->nofail) {
		chance = 100;	//cannot fail.
		_log(TRADESKILLS__TRACE, "...This combine cannot fail.");
	} else if(over_trivial > 0) {
		// At reaching trivial the chance goes to 95% going up an additional
		// percent for every 40 skillpoints above the trivial.
		// The success rate is not modified through stats.
		// Mastery AAs are unaccounted for so far.
		// chance_AA = chance + ((100 - chance) * mastery_modifier)
		// But the 95% limit with an additional 1% for every 40 skill points
		// above critical still stands.
		// Mastery modifier is: 10%/25%/50% for rank one/two/three
		chance = 95.0f + (float(user_skill - spec->trivial) / 40.0f);
		Message_StringID(4, TRADESKILL_TRIVIAL);
	} else if(chance < 5) {
		// Minimum chance is always 5
		chance = 5;
	} else if(chance > 95) {
		//cap is 95, shouldent reach this before trivial, but just in case.
		chance = 95;
	}
	
	_log(TRADESKILLS__TRACE, "...Current skill: %d , Trivial: %d , Success chance: %f percent", user_skill , spec->trivial , chance);
	_log(TRADESKILLS__TRACE, "...Bonusstat: %d , INT: %d , WIS: %d , DEX: %d , STR: %d", bonusstat , GetINT() , GetWIS() , GetDEX() , GetSTR());
	
	float res = MakeRandomFloat(0, 99);
<!	if ((tradeskill==75) || GetGM() || (chance > res)){
>!	if ((spec->tradeskill==75) || GetGM() || (chance > res)){
		success_modifier = 1;
		
		if(over_trivial < 0)
<!			CheckIncreaseTradeskill(bonusstat, stat_modifier, skillup_modifier, success_modifier, tradeskill);
!>			CheckIncreaseTradeskill(bonusstat, stat_modifier, skillup_modifier, success_modifier, spec->tradeskill);
		
		Message_StringID(4,TRADESKILL_SUCCEED);

		_log(TRADESKILLS__TRACE, "Tradeskill success");

		itr = spec->onsuccess.begin();
		while(itr != spec->onsuccess.end()) {
			//should we check this crap?
			SummonItem(itr->first, itr->second);
			itr++;
		}
		return(true);
	} else {
		success_modifier = 2; // Halves the chance
		
		if(over_trivial < 0)
<!			CheckIncreaseTradeskill(bonusstat, stat_modifier, skillup_modifier, success_modifier, tradeskill);
!>			CheckIncreaseTradeskill(bonusstat, stat_modifier, skillup_modifier, success_modifier, spec->tradeskill);
		
		Message_StringID(4,TRADESKILL_FAILED);

		_log(TRADESKILLS__TRACE, "Tradeskill failed");
		
		itr = spec->onfail.begin();
		while(itr != spec->onfail.end()) {
			//should we check these arguments?
			SummonItem(itr->first, itr->second);
			itr++;
		}
	}
	return(false);
}

changed signature to remove tradeskill as it is now part of spec
changed references to tradeskill to spec->tradeskill
changed compound if statement to switch to facilitate changes in evaluation (not needed for code to work)