iBleet, 
 
I didnt call anyone a dummy.. 
 
Have you not ever heard of the 'XXX for dummies'  line of books? 
I doubt the writer of those books intended to call everyone who was ignorant of a topic a dummy. 
 
A flame is a personal attack against someone,  I was merely defining what I believe we should or should not be doing with regards to the emu. 
 
A never made a personal reference directly against you, or anyone else for that matter.  I did not put names, I did not call anyone stupid, or a loser, or any of those things. 
 
> '1) Ye shall not flame. (Do not beat on others for their errors or >lack of intellegence on the subject, try to deal with it maturely)  
>Please respond maturely in the future, or do NOT reply to my >posts at ALL Trumpcard. Thank you.' 
 
I never beat anyone for their lack of knowledge. Should I have instead just replied with RTFM ?  I dont think that would have been very considerate..  I replied with my point of view.. 
 
I think possibly you misread my use of the pronoun  'you' with meaning you personally.  If that is the case, that is not how it was intended.  'You' was a reference to the general catagory of people who typically show up asking the same questions over and over again.  
 
Also, I would surmise that some people who know their way around a computer do not like being called 'computer geeks'.  We could always make the assumption that your post was a flame in the first place. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |