|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
General::General Discussion General discussion about EverQuest(tm), EQEMu, and related topics. Do not post support topics here. |

09-12-2007, 03:57 AM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 290
|
|
You should start your retirement process now then :p~
Since your questions couldn't be completely random, it's just security through obscurity. All I need to do is manually refresh your page a few times and write down all the answers one time.
Since a bot can easily read your image text, it's simple to plug in the answers and have the bot compare text strings and generate the answer.
The main principal behind CAPTCHA is that the text is completely random, so it would be very difficult for someone to generate a hash table or maintain a list of answers. Setting a finite amount of possible solutions actually makes it easier for bots to crack your system.
Granted, noone would spend much effort to crack that type of CAPTCHA on a small site like this, but if it were a piece of widely distributed software or some big site, it would be cracked within minutes.
|

09-12-2007, 04:34 AM
|
Hill Giant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 248
|
|
except that lalo's solution works fine for "untargetted" attacking. if someone is taking the time to sniff the site for vulnerabilities in order to hand craft their bot's attack, we can assume it is a targetted attack from a (most likely small) set of addresses which can be black listed.
security through obscurity works fine, if it is maintained (read: the dictionary of questions is modified over time to prevent staleness), for a "one off" which our wiki would be (there wont be 1000's of shrink wrapped releases of our wiki).
== sfisque
|
 |
|
 |

09-12-2007, 05:06 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sneeking up behind a admin IRL
Posts: 169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfisque
except that lalo's solution works fine for "untargetted" attacking. if someone is taking the time to sniff the site for vulnerabilities in order to hand craft their bot's attack, we can assume it is a targetted attack from a (most likely small) set of addresses which can be black listed.
security through obscurity works fine, if it is maintained (read: the dictionary of questions is modified over time to prevent staleness), for a "one off" which our wiki would be (there wont be 1000's of shrink wrapped releases of our wiki).
== sfisque
|
Yeah but come on lol, the spammer is posting advertisements. Thats not targeted in the least, thats the same as email spam; someone has a list of URLs set up in a bot to go out and advertise their websites for the search engines to pick up on. I've seen the same thing on MediaWiki quite a bit.
Image verification, even the simplest verifications will shut down the spam we have been seeing.
If someone is outright attacking the website, then the admins need to get a hold of the FBI, they DO investigate those whom intrude in networks and information systems (including gaining unauthorized access to spam the wiki).
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |

09-12-2007, 10:04 AM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 290
|
|
CAPTCHA will not stop spam. Bots like XRumer have proven that.
Unless our wiki software was custom written, it is just like the thousands of other sites that use it .. which is why spam bots hit us.
Regardless, why go through the trouble of making images and creating a DB of questions/answers ? Just add 1 custom field into the reg page, like a checkbox. Then, any bot would have to be programmed to submit the extra data.
I have run a few sites with phpBB on them for several years and the only thing that has ever eliminated spam on them is by slightly altering the submitted fields. Every CAPTCHA mod I tried was cracked before I even installed it. Granted, phpBB is much more widespread than this wiki software, but the principal is the same.
There is a new trick spammers use .. they set up a free porn site, harvest your CAPTCHA image, post it to the porn site, make surfers solve it to view nekked pics, then store the answer so it can solve it on your site. Even the most advanced and unreadable image can be cracked this way.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |

09-12-2007, 10:27 AM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
I agree with you here, and I've been told this before. But I imagine they will eventually get around that too.
EqEmu Forums always has had active Mods- so the simpelest, most effective solution would be to do what we are doing in the forums now; you have to send a pm to the Admin for approval to post. In fact, probably everone who's a Wiki poster is an EqEmu member, so , clean up what you have now and start with a "forum members only" policy. May not be able to do this since the forum and Wiki are different programs, but the person that allows the user to post in these forums, can go over and sign people up for the Wiki.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theeper
CAPTCHA will not stop spam. Bots like XRumer have proven that.
Unless our wiki software was custom written, it is just like the thousands of other sites that use it .. which is why spam bots hit us.
Regardless, why go through the trouble of making images and creating a DB of questions/answers ? Just add 1 custom field into the reg page, like a checkbox. Then, any bot would have to be programmed to submit the extra data.
I have run a few sites with phpBB on them for several years and the only thing that has ever eliminated spam on them is by slightly altering the submitted fields. Every CAPTCHA mod I tried was cracked before I even installed it. Granted, phpBB is much more widespread than this wiki software, but the principal is the same.
There is a new trick spammers use .. they set up a free porn site, harvest your CAPTCHA image, post it to the porn site, make surfers solve it to view nekked pics, then store the answer so it can solve it on your site. Even the most advanced and unreadable image can be cracked this way.
|
|
 |
|
 |

09-12-2007, 03:28 PM
|
Sarnak
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northwestern USA
Posts: 83
|
|
You guys seem to have good ideas and solutions to getting rid of the spammers, but until something is implemented I (and hopefully a few others) will just continue to despam the Wiki manually. 
|

09-25-2007, 07:16 PM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boogerific
You guys seem to have good ideas and solutions to getting rid of the spammers, but until something is implemented I (and hopefully a few others) will just continue to despam the Wiki manually. 
|
Appreciate your help here - we're working on a solution to this problem, I really like the Wikki a lot, just like these forums, it has helped me very much.
I won't forget the Wikki, and we will get it fixed.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |