Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
We don't have a decent log for the spawns of Nektulos 2.0, plus the zone itself sucks. It's way too small, that's why Sony created Nektulos 3.0 which our client does not support. Because of that, even if we did have a log, we'd still probably use the old version anyway.
|
Ahh ok, well that sums it up pretty well, I hate to make people change their zone files but I guess you can't win every battle.
However, I still need those coordinates from those sql queries I first posted :*(
I mean if the community was split on which version it used, I would probably go with the Nektulos 2.0 just because people wouldn't have to modify their game. Those who have, would already know how to change it back. I would of course redo the zone since my server is Custom so that wouldn't be a problem.
I don't know, I'm really split on which to use. I realize a bigger Nektulos zone would be nice, but I kinda liked the new Nektulos 2.0 look. Reminded me of Age of Empires II, Black Forest Random Map :P
I have a feeling the only people that would respond to this post regarding the zone would be those that are active members of the forums and probably those that have changed their file. I don't feel there is good way of getting a correct count...
Now I'm thinking about using Nektulos 2.0 again..
It's nice to actually call it by it's name Nektulos 2.0 :P