|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Support::Windows Servers Support forum for Windows EQEMu users. |

10-01-2008, 03:11 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
SVN stands for 'SubVersioN' and is a source code control system. Cavedude posted about it here:
http://eqemulator.net/forums/showthread.php?t=26376
Anyone can check-out the source code from there, and there are also occasional Win32 binary releases (click on the download tab). Every time new code is checked in, the 'Revision Number' bumps up by one. If you click on the 'Source' tab and then click on Changes, you can see a list of changes in each revision. As I am writing this, the latest revision is r29, but the latest Win32 binaries is r27. If you can't compile yourself, you'll need to wait until there is a revision29.zip (or later). The Win32 binaries on that site have to be created manually, so I can't say when the next one will be released.
|

10-01-2008, 03:31 PM
|
Dragon
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 689
|
|
This probably deserves its own thread, but since you're explaining it here, I'll ask -- Is there a reason that I'm getting an error trying to run eqlaunch.exe from the binaries on the new SVN? I've never ever had a problem with any binaries posted here to this site, but for some reason eqlaunch.exe doesn't want to run when I use any of the binaries from the revisions mentioned.
Because of this, I can't run any dynamic zones. I've been able to get into the world successfully by launching static zones and making sure my character is logged there but this isn't ideal, as I'm sure you can imagine =) Just wondering what the difference between the two is. I imagine it's a difference in the method through which they're compiled, but was hoping to have some light shed on it. Thank you for anything you can offer.
|

10-01-2008, 03:37 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
What's the error you are getting ? I just downloaded revision27.zip and it launches OK for me.
|
 |
|
 |

10-01-2008, 03:44 PM
|
Dragon
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 689
|
|
Let me recreate, just a moment. I wrote up a PM earlier in the day I was going to send to trevius, and wound up refreshing the page by mistake and losing it =P
"The application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem."
Googling that error code hasn't helped me much, as most of the support threads deal with people who are having issues with what they've compiled. That sort of helps, as it tells me there's something different, but not exactly what.
I've also noticed that the file sizes are pretty different between the latest build (1129) and what's contained in the revision binaries.
Thanks again for any ideas and for looking into this. Trying to run this all under Windows Server 2003, if that's any help. Never a single issue with any of the builds posted on this site.
EDIT: Just tried running this on my laptop here, which is Vista Ultimate 64-bit, and it ran. So it seems the problem is on my end somewhere, oddly enough.
|
 |
|
 |

10-01-2008, 03:48 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by So_1337
"The application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem."
|
From that error, my guess is that the binaries are not 100% statically linked and are maybe looking for the Visual C++ 2005 runtime libraries. I'm using Vista Ultimate 64 which probably comes with them pre-installed.
You could try installing the runtime libraries:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
|

10-01-2008, 03:53 PM
|
Dragon
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 689
|
|
Was worth a shot, but still no dice. I'll just be patient and wait for the next build to roll out here. Thanks for the idea =)
Back to your regularly scheduled thread, sorry for the hijack!
|

10-01-2008, 04:33 PM
|
Dragon
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 689
|
|
Think I found the issue -- Had to install the Microsoft .NET framework versions 2 and 3. Thanks for the help =)
|

10-01-2008, 03:45 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9
|
|
Thx again Derision!
I don't really know that much about pure coding so i guess ill
have wait until a win32 binary is realized.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |