|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Support::Packetcollector Any PacketCollector related problems or questions should be posted here. |

05-30-2010, 03:04 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
Found a problem, spawngroup is using the npcid for its id instead of the one you specify. The funny thing is, spawnentry is using the proper spawngroupID (meaning, the one you specify, and not the npcid.) In my testing, all other IDs look to be OK.
|
Hopefully that is fixed in v1.3 (just uploaded it).
|

05-30-2010, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 2,072
|
|
There's got to be a way we could manipulate as script to pull raw loot tables from Lucy. And modify from there.
|

05-30-2010, 03:50 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: .
Posts: 17
|
|
Anyone able to get the rest or more of the sod zones? Would really love to see more sod stuff in eqemu.
|

05-30-2010, 03:52 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 2,072
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tricyclethief
Anyone able to get the rest or more of the sod zones? Would really love to see more sod stuff in eqemu.
|
Working on them
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 04:01 PM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akkadius
There's got to be a way we could manipulate as script to pull raw loot tables from Lucy. And modify from there.
|
Gaeorn is working on that, actually. He did merchant lists, though there is a major bug with the output I need to talk to him about before the sql released.
Quote:
Hopefully that is fixed in v1.3 (just uploaded it).
|
Yep, Derision that fixed it, I can now build! I did find one more tiny problem, though. You'll need to add a doorid field next to version. The doorid currently always starts at 1, and that will conflict if the zone already has doors in another version.
Quote:
What would be your suggestion in order to keep everything compatible and to be able to submit it to PEQ?
Also, this just gets doors, zone entries, NPC entries in-game. What about adding in special attacks, spells, loot, etc? What's the easiest way to help with this?
|
To merge into PEQ is pretty tough, because for everything except for NPCs, we use the next available ID. If you feel comfortable, you can send any pcap logs you gather to me at npcswithoutfaces@gmail.com. Otherwise, I don't know a way for multiple people to successfully merge into PEQ, especially since our IDs are going to change QUICK now. SQLs won't help much in this case because the IDs will almost certainly conflict.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 04:13 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 2,072
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
Gaeorn is working on that, actually. He did merchant lists, though there is a major bug with the output I need to talk to him about before the sql released.
Yep, Derision that fixed it, I can now build! I did find one more tiny problem, though. You'll need to add a doorid field next to version. The doorid currently always starts at 1, and that will conflict if the zone already has doors in another version.
To merge into PEQ is pretty tough, because for everything except for NPCs, we use the next available ID. If you feel comfortable, you can send any pcap logs you gather to me at npcswithoutfaces@gmail.com. Otherwise, I don't know a way for multiple people to successfully merge into PEQ, especially since our IDs are going to change QUICK now. SQLs won't help much in this case because the IDs will almost certainly conflict.
|
A loot table script would be phenomenal. I wouldn't mind helping with this.
|
 |
|
 |

05-31-2010, 01:49 AM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 478
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akkadius
A loot table script would be phenomenal. I wouldn't mind helping with this.
|
I already farmed all the data from magelo for their loot info for all mobs in all zones. I suppose the same could be done for lucy, but I believe the magelo data is more complete. I can write a script to parse out the usable data without an issue. The problem comes in when it's time to write out that data in some usable form. I haven't started on the script yet because I haven't yet decided how to write out the data. I'm sure I'll either write out SQL or I'll create temp tables and dump the data there, but I'm sure it'll take a human to merge it in cleanly with the PEQ db.
If you want to help, look at the magelo drop data and see what ideas you come up with for using it. I'd love to hear more ideas about how best to use that data.
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 04:21 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
our IDs are going to change QUICK now. SQLs won't help much in this case because the IDs will almost certainly conflict.
|
I did wonder if I could set variables for the starting Insert IDs at the start of the generated SQL and just reference them with increments afterwards, so you could just change
a few variables at the start to the next free IDs. I didn't know if I could do that in SQL, but I just tested it with select statements, and it seems to be possible:
Code:
set @myinsertid = 1001;
select id, name from npc_types where id = @myinsertid;
select id, name from npc_types where id = @myinsertid + 1;
Output:
Code:
mysql> source test.sql
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
+------+-------------+
| id | name |
+------+-------------+
| 1001 | Guard_Mezzt |
+------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
+------+--------------+
| id | name |
+------+--------------+
| 1002 | Guard_Jerith |
+------+--------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
So maybe that is the way to go.
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 04:37 PM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derision
So maybe that is the way to go.
|
Yes! I think you got it! It would mean everybody would need to re-dump their SQLs to share, but it would also mean that with a couple changes all those files will be universal over any database.
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 05:24 PM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
Yes! I think you got it! It would mean everybody would need to re-dump their SQLs to share, but it would also mean that with a couple changes all those files will be universal
over any database.
|
How would it be if I removed all the INSERT ID fields from the Extractor UI, so you didn't have to worry about them when generating the SQL, and could just go in afterwards
and set them as required, i.e. I would put a template at the start of the generated SQL like:
Code:
set @NPCTypesStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
set @SpawnEntryStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
...
...
-- Set the starting Insert IDs above and remove the exit statement below before executing this SQL
exit
<Generated Insert statements follow, referencing the variables defined above>
I.e. you would just have to press the Load .pcap button, select the .pcap file, alter the check boxes if you wanted, not have to worry about IDs at that point, and then just click 'Generate SQL'.
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 05:27 PM
|
 |
Demi-God
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: b
Posts: 1,449
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derision
How would it be if I removed all the INSERT ID fields from the Extractor UI, so you didn't have to worry about them when generating the SQL, and could just go in afterwards
and set them as required, i.e. I would put a template at the start of the generated SQL like:
Code:
set @NPCTypesStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
set @SpawnEntryStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
...
...
-- Set the starting Insert IDs above and remove the exit statement below before executing this SQL
exit
<Generated Insert statements follow, referencing the variables defined above>
I.e. you would just have to press the Load .pcap button, select the .pcap file, alter the check boxes if you wanted, not have to worry about IDs at that point, and then just click 'Generate SQL'.
|
That seems ideal to me. That way it's compatable with any database.
|
 |
|
 |

05-30-2010, 05:45 PM
|
 |
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,946
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derision
How would it be if I removed all the INSERT ID fields from the Extractor UI, so you didn't have to worry about them when generating the SQL, and could just go in afterwards
and set them as required, i.e. I would put a template at the start of the generated SQL like:
Code:
set @NPCTypesStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
set @SpawnEntryStartingInsertID = XXXXXXX
...
...
-- Set the starting Insert IDs above and remove the exit statement below before executing this SQL
exit
<Generated Insert statements follow, referencing the variables defined above>
I.e. you would just have to press the Load .pcap button, select the .pcap file, alter the check boxes if you wanted, not have to worry about IDs at that point, and then just click 'Generate SQL'.
|
I prefer having the fields there, but a simple toggle box to toggle them enabled/disabled would work well. That way, people could toggle them off when collecting for PEQ or leave them on if collecting for their own DB. A simple toggle would make it nice and quick to generate one of each type of you wanted. I think it is nice to be able to see the actual range of numbers that the SQL is planning to use so it can be easily compared against the DB to make sure it will be ok.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |

05-31-2010, 01:52 AM
|
Developer
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 478
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derision
I did wonder if I could set variables for the starting Insert IDs at the start of the generated SQL and just reference them with increments afterwards, so you could just change
a few variables at the start to the next free IDs. I didn't know if I could do that in SQL, but I just tested it with select statements, and it seems to be possible:
Code:
set @myinsertid = 1001;
select id, name from npc_types where id = @myinsertid;
select id, name from npc_types where id = @myinsertid + 1;
Output:
Code:
mysql> source test.sql
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
+------+-------------+
| id | name |
+------+-------------+
| 1001 | Guard_Mezzt |
+------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
+------+--------------+
| id | name |
+------+--------------+
| 1002 | Guard_Jerith |
+------+--------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
So maybe that is the way to go.
|
Why not just fill in the ID with a sub select? You could simply do a (select max(id) from table)+1 where you would otherwise put in the ID. Or you could at least use a select to automatically set the variable at the start and otherwise do it as you have above.
|
 |
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |