Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XxMadHatterxX
...What a disgusting thing now, that a certain set of people are setting values for the rest of us. It deeply upsets me.
|
WTF? I mean, seriously... So if Kerry was president, he wouldn't be setting values for the rest of us either? It wasn't a contest of he-with-values and he-without. It was two candidates of two different sets of values - and America felt that Bush's set of values was something they'd rather have decisions based apon than those of Senator Kerry. People said they voted for Bush because of his values - not that he has any and Kerry does not.
Kerry was such a weak canidate - too chaotic, basing his opinion on what would get him the greatest popularity. Look at his religion (a typical source of values for most Americans) - he eagerly promoted ideals that were against his belief system. Why? For votes. He's for the war, until it starts turning up bad - then he's against the war.
At least with President Bush you know what you'll have for the next four years, because he'll always take the same stance. Kerry in the presidency would be dangerous - we'd never know what to expect.
Besides, his campaining manager really lost him the election. All his votes came from the same democratic states as the last election. For the democrats to have a remote chance of winning the next election they need to sway some republic voters over, but they won't do that with such a blantant opposer of traditional-values such as either Kerry or Hillary.
Threaded Mode
