Blizzard shutting down WoW emu...

[kharmakazy]

http://www.blizzhackers.com/viewtopic.php?t=279994

Well, this is a good example of the side of the argument against eqemu...
IF these people are being shut down then eqemu has been pretty lucky, or pretty smart. Probably both.

[Ghost Fire]

Well EQEmulator does NOT edit the EverQuest Client. In fact the Forums don't even let people post where you can get the Backpatches.
Here is a hint on how you can know that "DO NOT PATCH - Latest EQ Patch Breaks EQEmulator."

Sooo in other words stop bringing this old junk up. :P

[iwantavr4]

Originally Posted by Ghost Fire

Well EQEmulator does NOT edit the EverQuest Client. In fact the Forums don't even let people post where you can get the Backpatches.
Here is a hint on how you can know that "DO NOT PATCH - Latest EQ Patch Breaks EQEmulator."

Sooo in other words stop bringing this old junk up. :P

Well eqemu still does violate Everquest EULA and their intellectual property rights... Its hardly grey area if Sony chose to attack the emu. Backpatching has nothing to do with intellectual property, violation of the EULA, and 'lost profits'.

They could basically copy WoWs message thats posted on that website and change WoW and Blizzard to eq and sony, and submit it here... Same with UOX and Ultima Online. Its all the same.

[RangerDown]

Sony has come out ahead on my account because of EQEmu. Game-wise, I'm pretty much done with the Everquest series -- EQ or EQ2. But I've turned my EQ account up for a month on several occasions to packet collect. And I'm willing to packet collect for EQ2 in the future if necessary.

I don't have any respect for somebody who joins this community simply because they don't want to pay $25 for EQ Platinum and go play on a live server. (I respect them even less when they then proceed to bash the project about all the bugs and misfeatures, but that's irrelevant.) I wouldn't mind there actually being a rule that you have to have bought the full game and made a full (non-trial) account to join this community. While we have no way of enforcing that for every user -- we could at least kick out anyone who comes here and openly says they have no EQ account, never had an EQ account, and don't wanna spend a measly $25 for a copy of the game.

I also urge as many of you as possible to turn up your accounts and packet collect when it's needed. EQEmu has always been plagued by a serious shortage of willing packet collectors. I think it's only fair to turn up your account from time to time and let Sony get a little, it both help eqemu get live compatible AND helps debunk the "lost profits" argument.

[solid11]

Wow, Ranger sounds like a recruiter for Sony, wink, wink, JK Ranger. I totally agree with him that if you have never experienced live before coming here then you missed out on what all this work is about. The reason so many people work so hard on emu is they liked what they played on live (before some of the crappy expansions hit I bet). I have pumped so much money to SOE in the last 3 years... expansions, multiple account subscriptions, yada yada. I just reupped my account for the sole purpose of collecting, but even I found myself hanging with some old friends on there and reliving old times.

Do what Rangerdown says and experience live content before coming on here , and you'll know why bugs and problems are so hard to fix sometimes. You'll know why everyone works so hard with no returns besides knowing you helped the Emu and the community as a whole.

[Sakrateri]

Ive got 6 live accounts which I still play from time to time . I have lost serious interest with the advent of lucline and everything else beyond. Though I do not play my accounts have been payed uninterupted since 2000, I have several high level characters and make a nice group for myself but the fun has died out and the reason for it is the serious lack of a brains needed to play on live anymore. I have found working on a server to be much more challenging then playing todays EQ could ever be . One thing that erks me is when people get on here and try to dispute the legality of the Emu . If you dont like it leave and if you are an employee or representative of SOE then by all means visit my site at www.fatesdestiny.com and I will show you where you went wrong. And Kharma that is old and boring news you have brought to these boards. I also run a WoW server along with a PSO server so dont say Blizz snuffed it out because that is like saying the war on drugs has put the use of drugs to an end . WoW emus are just as live and active as the EQemu. And as far as violating the Eula Iwant , ask everyone that plays on my server exactly what the Eula says , I bet you would be surprised !

[kawika]

*listens for a whip to crack after Ranger's and Sakrateri's post*

Yea, what they said! I personally run 5 EQ Live accounts, the reasons I want to have an emu is solely for exploring and when SOE screws up and all the Live servers go down.

[RangerDown]

Bah, just forget it.

We have a policy on warez and backpatcher talk, but it's evidently just toilet paper filler.

As we speak there is a thread here: http://www.eqemulator.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18827
which a mod was informed of, 20 minutes ago. It's still up and alive and kicking. In the past month there have been at least 3 previous ones where somebody blatantly asked about backpatching, and not a thing was done.

This 10,000 character limit on posts really makes it hard to post SQL for people to source in. So if you have a PEQ database and want zone table entries for Luclin and beyond, well... sorry you're out of luck. No, don't PM me for it, I'm not doing that. You should start by PM'ing your forum admins and asking for some changes to be made.

Until then, I've done all I can do. Peace out.

....



its not my fault im still internetless at home, for another 2-3 weeks, dont worry RD ill be back soon and start enforcing the rules again.

Donno what happend to the moderators for here, since i havent been around, but ill be back soon!!!

p.s. Thread deleted user banned.

[Windcatcher]

You know, I'm getting tired of this nebulous "intellectual property rights" mantra as if it means anything the vendor wants it do mean. It does not. There are certain rights they have, such as copyright, which means that no one can distribute anything they create without their permission. They also have the right to ensure that people can't duplicate work that is uniquely their creation--this means that a rival could create an MMORPG featuring elves, dwarves, humans, etc., since SOE didn't create those, but creating a new game featuring Erudeans, for instance, would probably be prohibited (just as no one can distribute anything featuring a Disney character--they are creations solely attributable to Disney). Software vendors also have the right that their products not be altered, but they do not have the right that their products not be replaced.

There is no right granted to a vendor that says they can prohibit anyone from creating an add-on to their product, and no law exists that requires obtaining permission from such a vendor. If Edelbrock wants to create aftermarket parts, they do *not* have to obtain permission from Ford, GM, et. al., and any "intellectual property rights" claim from said vendors would be laughed out of court. To the best of my knowledge there is no special provision for software vendors. The reason for this is antitrust law: vendors in the past used anticompetitive techniques to lock in customers and lock out competitors (including potential competitors in the aftermarket area), and antitrust laws were created to bring competition back to the market (any captalist worth his salt knows that capitalism *requires* competition to work properly). So when people start throwing the "intellectual property rights" charge around, beware: there are rights they may wish to have and rights they actually have. The right to deny third-party add-ons isn't one of them.

In the case of EQEmu, the situation is even more clear: it is neither an add-on to their client nor does it alter it in any way. It is a drop-in-replacement for one of SOE's products, one they have never released to the public (strictly speaking, it constitutes competition against SOE and that is definitely protected under antitrust law). At the most SOE might be able to allege a trademark violation (in the sense that MS made Lindows change their name), and if I were running the emu I would have removed the letters "e" and "q" from the emu's name ages ago. This was how Blizzard shut down Freecraft, by the way--purely via a trademark suit against the name, since that was all they could charge (and that, friends, is exactly why I will never buy a Blizzard product again--anyone who would do something that lame and/or despicable deserves not my money).

All this said, if it were Blizzard instead of SOE, I'm sure the emu would have been shut down years ago--not because they might actually win a suit, but simply because Blizzard seems in my opinion to be more apt to play the legal extortion game--"expend your life savings defending yourself from us, or give us what we want." Anti-SLAPP lawsuits only come into play after you've suffered damages in legal fees, and of course there is no guarantee that you'll win (and not all states have anti-SLAPP statutes, though mine sure as hell does).

In the end if SOE wants to shut the emu down I suppose they could play the Blizard game and just issue a C&D nastygram, regardless of its merits. Why they haven't is a mystery to me. I want to think there's someone there who is actually interested in obeying the law rather than using extortion, but with Blizzard's antics nothing anymore surprises me so I can't make that assumption.

[Virus11]

Damn, WoW Emu was fun.

[Woodlife Treestrider]

It was fun for awhile. Most EMUs I found where really poorly put together, and pretty crappy. People did try, but I think this community has had the most accomplished version of a modern day mmorpg game.

[kharmakazy]

Wow... didnt see much movement on the forum here before.... but jesus you guys sure came out of the woodwork to vent there for a min...

I agree that people should have to have had an acount to use the emu... people who just want to essentially bootleg the game should be shot. ..

I would be playing on live now had i not been booted off, as I suspect is the reason at least a few people are here.

I want to play again... bless my heart.... You think sony will still hold a grudge about that incident 3 years ago? will they even check if I just open a new account?

On that note... I would be glad to packet collect if I can get back on live. But it seems that most of the stuff you guys need is from the high end game. Is there any call for packet collecting low level stuff?

[Windcatcher]

I think the concept of an emu of an existing MMORPG (any of them, for that matter), is fundamentally flawed and ultimately doomed to failure. When it comes to attempting to recreate the experience of a commercial server, no group of enthusiasts can hope to compete. There is simply too great a disparity in terms of available effort. From the start I've thought that the only viable way for an emu to really flourish (read: provide an enjoyable experience for its playerbase) is to quickly and irreversibly migrate from an emu to a non-emu: that is, to become a unique game in its own right, from rules all the way to content. Otherwise players will always be subconsciously comparing it to the real McCoy, and that's always a losing proposition.

Is it possible to create a hybrid, where there is some emulation and some uniqueness? Sure, and there are emerging examples of that trend. However, it still only scratches the surface of what's possible, and still leaves such servers under the commercial game's shadow in more ways than one.

This next part might sound like a dig at the devs; it isn't, and I'm really trying to provide food for thought here. Case in point:when you dig through the server code, just about everything is hardcoded for the EQ client, but it doesn't have to be. For example, instead of having netcode in source files, they could reside in a loadable DLL instead. There would be zero loss of speed, but it would allow servers to branch out toward different client types, like (gasp) a client that we could create with our own protocol. It can happen.

With respect to client-server communication, a client depends on many things, but certainly these: a method of packaging data (i.e. a network transport layer), a packet protocol (structs, opcodes, and sequence of usage), and game rules (formulae, for instance). It might be possible for the server to use DLL modules or something similar, so as to decouple it from the live client. How about a server that used AD&D rules instead? (either 1E, 2E, or 3E). Or maybe DragonQuest? (once again, pick your revision, there are several) Or a skills-based ruleset of our own creation? Using DLLs can allow these things. I think that for an emu to wish to be perceived as more than just a pale impersonator demands taking a serious look at this sort of thing. What's more, it makes it hard to legally justify going after such an emu: if an emu has several server modules, only one of which was an EQ module, then that's a whole other ball of wax (though the "eqemu" name would *have* to go at that point, and I'd urge the devs to do that anyway, based on the FreeCraft lesson). I don't know about anyone here, but I *detest* the EQ ruleset

[Woodlife Treestrider]

In reply to WindCatcher. I know your feeling. EQEmu will forever be exactly that, an EverQuest Emulator. Untill the devs and/or operators put some serious effort into making a server truely unique, then it will be a while before we finally see something new. I, along with two other people, are trying to go further with custom content then any server has even considered. Unfortunately, with the best developers stuck onto their own server, attempting to get them all under one server would be near impossible. A big problem Kerosh, Luft, and myself are facing is that us three do not know certain aspects of our customization. For one, we are having a hard time finding a person to help us with creating custom zones. So far, I have seen that Khan is the best with modeling and zone creating. But that is one person. Expecting one person to make all of our extensively large custom zones is unfair and unfortunate.

But, back on topic. I know what your saying, and your very true. If you want to play EverQuest the way it was meant to be, than Winter's Roar is the only way to go. But, for those of us who want to see something never done before, then I urge you to make a difference.


P.S.: To anyone who read the above and wants to help out with Kerosh, Luft, and myself, then PLEASE contact one of us. We are here for the long run, and we need people skilled and who are also willing to stick around to really see this thing work. If you want more information, or would like to help in develop this server, please contact one, if not all, of us.