I am still stuck at this same point, but I am not giving up that easily :P Last night, I started trying to figure out why character creation wasn't working. I have the correct Opcode, but I see that the server is expecting a struct to come in and the client is sending just the opcode with a size of 0. The client just hangs probably waiting for something back that we aren't sending. I am going to try filling in the needed character select stuff on the server side and then have it send the character create opcode back to the client. So, it would be working in reverse of how Titanium does it. If that works, then it means they might have been adjusting the order of server/client communications, maybe to optimize some stuff.
If so, maybe that is the reason that sendexpzonein is failing. It could be waiting for something else that we aren't sending. I will try forcing a few of the packets that normally follow the sendexpzonein and see if that makes any difference. I definitely see it is doing something extra in the assembly code of SoF that wasn't in Titanium, but there is no way to really tell what it is. It could either be waiting for an extra opcode that got added to the sendexpzonein stuff, or it could be waiting for a new structure that we don't have in Titanium. I am hoping it is the former, not the latter.
Other than that, the other big difference I notice is that some of the subs being called in area where the problem is happening have about 1000 set as the variables where Titanium has about 800 set. That makes me think that it is checking the size of a certain packet structure, but I don't know which one. If I am right, I think that one of the structures needed at this point has changed and we need to figure out which one and what it was changed to so it can be adjusted.
My last resort will be to setup the current showeq for Live and setup a trial account to watch the logs from SEQ and see what the current structures really are. I am sure that some of the SEQ structures are correct, but there is alot of info they don't need for SEQ to function so it probably gets ignored. Maybe I can find more details and get them filled in to get it working. Also, it would help to see if anything new is being sent. Unfortunately, I don't have any SEQ logs from when Titanium was running on Live, so I don't have anything to compare with. That will probably make feeding through this stuff considerably harder.
|
Threaded Mode
