COMMITTED: Slow Mitigation

[Shendare]

My memory suggests that there were two mitigation messages:

Your slow was mostly successful.

Your slow was partially successful.

I don't know what mitigation percentage levels determined which of the two messages was sent, however. Whether 1-33% mitigation sending "mostly" and 34%+ "partially", or 1-50% "mostly" and 51%+ "partially", or something else, no clue.

[Dibalamin]

Think of it this way

Immune ---> Partially ---> Mostly ----> Fully
0 ---> 25% of effect --- > Half Effect ---> Full Effect

[gaeorn]

I found this in eqstr_us.txt:

9029 Your spell was mostly successful.
9030 Your spell was partially successful.
9031 Your spell was slightly successful.
9032 Your spell may have had the opposite effect of what you desired.

[Shendare]

Aha, very good! Looks like increments of 25% perhaps?

Mitigate 25% - Mostly successful
Mitigate 50% - Partially successful
Mitigate 75% - Slightly successful
Mitigate 100% - Immune
Mitigate 125% - Opposite Effect (haste 25% instead of slow)

[gaeorn]

I was thinking increments of 33.3%

0% mitigated = no message
0.1-33.3% mitigated = mostly
33.4-66.6% mitigated = partially
66.7-99.9% mitigated = slightly
100% mitigated = immune
100.1% and up mitigated = opposite effect

[Shendare]

Good call, good call. That looks perfectly logical to me.

[gaeorn]

Of course, that's assuming it's an even split between the messages. Could be that it's two 25% and one 50% for all we know. I wonder if it's worth the time to try to research it.