Abundance of Non-administrated servers

[RStefan01]

There were a few people playing on Oasis last night (including me). For what it's worth, it seems like an easy-mode tuned solo server. Dunno if there's any endgame or not yet, didn't get through all of the content. Good way to waste a few hours at least, but doesn't seem like something that'd sustain a population.

I don't think I've ever played on any of those other servers, but it's probably only a matter of time. I server hop a lot ;p

[Maze_EQ]

On a FPS, you don't invest 100's of hours into it.

Everquest is totally different than a FPS, don't see why you would compare the two.

About the server list, it was just to see other's thoughts on it, not saying to segregate those servers that have 0 players on them, as I completely understand that some may be test beds, and some may be works in progress.

And yes, the server list is daunting to new comers, after all, this is the Emulator, where not everything is live-like.

I know there is a server list, and whatnot, on live, but every server is typically the same for Sony.

Exactly as I just said, I wanted to know other people's opinions on the subject, and see if there was a classification system that can be embraced.

I never said to force people to have server ranking, I just thought it would clean things up a little bit.

[chrsschb]

Clumsy's World is up because the admin has die-hard fans who still want to play there (despite the lack of population). It was once a bustling server of epic proportions but alas people move on and try new things.