Go Back   EQEmulator Home > EQEmulator Forums > Archives > Archive::General > Archive::Server Discussion
Reload this Page Updated Again!: Suggestions & Comments on INC server. 5.

Archive::Server Discussion Archive area for Server Discussion's posts that were moved here after an inactivity period of 90 days.

View Poll Results: Would you prefer/highly suggest that kunark is enabled?
Yes 51 85.00%
No 9 15.00%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #39  
Old 08-15-2003, 06:41 AM
Fatdave
Fire Beetle
  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10
Default
A suggestion: If you're planning on adding Kunark and making it semi/full legit you should completely revamp the drops in places like Veeshans Peak. I can tell you from personal experience even when that zone was the pinnacle of EQ exsistence it also happened to have for the risks involved some TERRIBLE rewards. Also, since there won't be that many people playing, you should increase drop frequencies just so people won't have to spend hours doing tedious camps like they currently have to in EQ.
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.

EQEmulator - Archive - Top

 

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
EQEmulator is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
       
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template by Bluepearl Design and vBulletin Templates - Ver3.3